Tóchi uc LLC
series “Rabby”

RA Gallery presents

​

artist, author: Tóchi uc LLC

​

editor & acoustic: C. Titova

 

series “Rabby”

10.10 - 23.10.2025

 

The exhibition includes two parallel series: “Rabby” at the RA Gallery and “Tabby” at the Soviart Gallery. Both series take place simultaneously and create a dialogue between fragments of images, sound and text, transforming contradictions into an artistic method.

The “Lost Correspondence” project, which includes the “Rabby” and “Tabby” series, is an attempt to transform the fragmentation of experience into an artistic language. Through a change of media, breaks and pauses, the project invites the viewer to restore the “correspondence” themselves – between frames, space and their own memory.

This is an investigation of lost communication, memory and meaning through a combination of different art forms: film, graphics, installation and performance.

The project also involves Siya Titova, a documentary film director and cameraman, who collaborates with Tóchi on the visual and sensory content of the series.

The essence of the “Rabby” series:

You see scattered letters.

The author says: “I deliberately scattered these letters so as not to give you a ready-made answer.”

Philosophy: all my complex text means: “The meaning of this project is not in the letters, but in you.”

Your task: as you walk among these letters, your brain tries to find a connection and logic in them. This search for connection is a real work of art.

In the simplest terms: the author gave you a “signal”, not a “message”.

He expects you to become a creator yourself, deciphering his “message”.

 

Author's text: An attempt to study the genesis in order to explore  open structure and composition as a process of forming a project in the context of coherence and coreference as means of epistemological and ostensive interpretation — employing semantic-logical and syntactic analysis within the framework of space and form exterior alignment.           A reflective attempt to define the paradigm in the context of presupposition, with the absence of a direct denotatum and the incorporated role of the predicate, referent, and actant as elements of correlation, along with the definition of communicative and commutative rank (articulation:  discursive induction, syllabic synthetic; stigmatic determinism:   reduction,  disposition) and associative rank (comprising valency indexing  through transitive and apodictic substitution of implicative and inversional index). Tautologically, following the  “Lost Correspondence" series and aligning  it in a coherent indiguity of the  semiotic items compilation components  how does paralogism become open parenthesis, and how does periphrasis as an element become a metonymic form within the context of the counter-inductive principle (a procedural hypothesis or epistemological dialectic with the determination of intentional exteriority)?